More liberal agenda nonsense that has NOTHING to do with public health or displaced Americans who are unemployed. This is just a way for House Democrats to further their anti Voter ID law agenda….and push for more mail-in voting, which of course, is insane. Voter ID is the ONLY way to prevent voter fraud. Naturally, Democrats who want more illegal aliens voting for them, want voter ID done away with. Hopefully, the Senate won’t let this pass. We need voter ID laws now more than ever.
This is today’s ridiculous story of the day..and makes for a good laugh on this Friday. Of COURSE anything put out by UCLA (a breathtakingly liberal university in the People’s Republic of California) regarding the LGBT issue is gonna be “overblown.” Recently we reported on a newly released census study that says those who consider themselves to be LGBT is between 3-4% of the total U.S. population. I was under the impression for years (thanks to the disinformation on this subject) that it was between 8-10%. So, I was WAY off. Federal government statistics set me straight, and we reported that. Facts, indeed, ARE “stubborn things!” UCLA is suggesting that voter ID laws are “oppressing” members of the LGBT community. Gimme a break! Is that same community “oppressed” by their driver’s licenses when they get pulled over? or if they’re carded at a drinking establishment? I kinda doubt it. Its all bs; always is. And don’t ya ever notice how those same groups that cry “oppression” over such things as voter ID laws (which make perfect common sense), are those same groups that tend to get indicted for voter fraud? Groups like Obama’s old group ACORN? Yeah.. Consider the sources. Its perfectly reasonable to have to show a valid, government issued, photo ID in order to vote. You have to have one to drive a car, or be able to drink alcohol in a bar or restaurant. It makes all the sense in the world that you prove you actually live where you say you live (and that you’re not dead or a dog, etc.) in the district where you’re voting, and properly registered to vote in that election. Its just a small way, at the local level, to cut down on the out-of-control rampant voter fraud in this country. There are already studies suggesting that Obama MAY have actually lost the 2012 election, and that Mitt Romney won that election. But, voter fraud on the part of many Democrats pushed Obama over the line. Of course its all water under the bridge now. Just consider how different things would have been the last two years had Mitt won. Yeah.. Exactly..
Yes!!! Excellent!!! Great news, and BIG victory for workers in Wisconsin!! Now, those who are in unions won’t be subjected to automatic union dues being withdrawn out of their paychecks without consent, among other things. Act 10 is absolutely constitutionally sound and reigns in thuggish unions in Wisconsin just a little. And, hopefully the federal courts will uphold this court’s decision on the voter ID law there requiring a photo ID when voting, something that is eminently reasonable. Excellent!!! 🙂
Booo!!! Hope this verdict is appealed. The notion that requiring a voter to show a photo ID is somehow disenfranchising women and minorities is absurd. As I often say.. You have to have a driver’s license to drive, and everybody has a driver’s license…c’mon. The arguments against voter photo ID laws are so weak and intellectually dishonest is ridiculous.