The number of deaths from fentanyl overdoses in San Francisco jumped by nearly 150 percent last year, according to a report by the city’s public health department made public this week. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, 89 deaths in the city were attributed to fentanyl overdoses, up from 37 deaths in 2017. By comparison, 70 people died from prescription opioid overdoses and 60 deaths were attributed to heroin overdoses. A preliminary report released in June attributed 57 deaths to fentanyl overdoses, but health officials told the Chronicle they had expected that figure to increase as the city medical examiner determined the cause of more deaths. The city has experienced an uptick in fentanyl-related deaths since 2008, when five deaths were reported. In 2010, six deaths were attributed to the drug, which killed 22 people in 2016. “It’s not a huge surprise to see this, although it’s certainly disappointing and sad to have lost this many lives in the city,” Dr. Phillip Coffin, the director of substance use research for the San Francisco Department of Public Health, told the Chronicle.“Unfortunately, there is no locality that can withstand the introduction of fentanyl without some increase in mortality.” In its legal form, fentanyl is used to treat patients recovering from surgery. However, the synthetic drug is often mixed with other drugs like heroin and cocaine in powder form for those looking to get high, KTVU reported in June. “In San Francisco, that’s how fentanyl came to us. In counterfeit pills at first a few years ago. At this point it is its own drug supply,” Kristen Marshall from the Drug Overdose Prevention & Education Project told the station. Fentanyl is a highly addictive opiate that is 100 times more potent than other prescription opioids like morphine, according to the paper. “It has taken over heroin as the number one choice for opioid,” Dr. Chris Colwell, chief of emergency medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, told the station. Coffin said fentanyl has “become more and more prevalent as the opioid that people are using in San Francisco” and “is a riskier opioid compared to prescription opioids.” A Drug Enforcement Administration report said drug companies shipped billions of painkillers across America without proper oversight for several years, exacerbating the opioid crisis. The report said 76 billion oxycodone and hydrocodone pills were shipped to mostly rural and working-class communities in the Appalachian region, which has become the epicenter of the crisis.
Just add this to the list of failures in San Francisco, which has been under solid Democrat party control for over half a century. Yeah.. over half a century. Everything from the homeless crisis there, to the drug needles in the streets and people defecating in the streets..to out-of-control crime, and now fentanyl..all due to failed public policies of Democrats who have a stranglehold on what was once a thriving and beautiful city. And, with an over 10-1 Democrat voter registration advantage, that won’t change anytime soon.
The heroin needles, the pile of excrement between parked cars, the yellow soup oozing out of a large plastic bag by the curb and the stained, faux Persian carpet dumped on the corner. It is a scene of detritus that might bring to mind any variety of developing-world squalor. But this is San Francisco, the capital of the nation’s technology industry, where a single span of Hyde Street hosts an open-air narcotics market by day and at night is occupied by the unsheltered and drug-addled slumped on the sidewalk. There are many other streets like it, but by one measure it is the dirtiest block in the city. Just a 15-minute walk away are the offices of Twitter and Uber, two companies that along with other nameplate technology giants have helped push the median price of a home in San Francisco well beyond a million dollars. This dichotomy of street crime and world-changing technology, of luxury condominiums and grinding, persistent homelessness, and the dehumanizing effects for those forced to live on the streets provoke outrage among the city’s residents. For many who live here it is difficult to reconcile San Francisco’s liberal politics with the misery that surrounds them. According to city statisticians, the 300 block of Hyde Street, a span about the length of a football field in the heart of the Tenderloin neighborhood, received 2,227 complaints about street and sidewalk cleanliness over the past decade, more than any other. It is an imperfect measurement — some blocks might be dirtier but have fewer calls — but residents on the 300 block say that they are not surprised by their ranking. The San Francisco bureau photographer, Jim Wilson, and I set out to measure the depth of deprivation on a single block. We returned a number of times, including a 12-hour visit, from 2 p.m. to 2 a.m. on a recent weekday. Walking around the neighborhood we saw the desperation of the mentally ill, the drug dependent and homeless, and heard from embittered residents who say it will take much more than a broom to clean up the city, long considered one of the United States’ beacons of urban beauty. Human waste has become such a widespread problem in San Francisco that the city in September established a unit dedicated to removing it from the sidewalks. Rachel Gordon, a spokeswoman for the public works department, describes the new initiative as a “proactive human waste” unit. At 8 a.m. on a recent morning, as mothers shepherded their children to school, we ran into Yolanda Warren, a receptionist who works around the corner from Hyde Street. The sidewalk in front of her office was stained with feces. The street smelled like a latrine. “Some parts of the Tenderloin, you’re walking, and you smell it and you have to hold your breath,” Warren said. At she does every morning, she hosed down the urine outside her office. The city has installed five portable bathrooms for the hundreds of unsheltered people in the Tenderloin but that has not stopped people from urinating and defecating in the streets.
You get the idea.. And this is an article from the very liberal NY Times; not some conservative news media outlet. San Fran is a poster child of what happens when years and years of extreme liberal politicians enact failed liberal policies in a major urban area for decades. San Fran is a total disaster, and it’ll remain so until the residents decide that enough is enough and actually consider voting for politicians who aren’t the same liberal Democrats they’ve been electing for decades. But, don’t hold your breath…or your nose. For more, click on the text above.
The city of San Francisco just can’t seem to do anything right. The city’s liberal policies designed to welcome the homeless and encourage illegal drug use is turning the city from a high-tech haven of beauty and cleanliness, to what UC Berkeley professor Lee Riley described as unsanitary conditions “much greater than communities in Brazil or Kenya or India.” Congratulations lefties, the former crown jewel of the West Coast is now being compared to some of the dirtiest slums in the world. Since the beginning of 2018, the city has received over 14,000 calls to the 311 service about feces on the sidewalks and in the streets. It has gotten so bad the city has lost conventions because of the filth. It appears the city is tired of being the butt of national jokes and has decided to fight back. Local officials have announced yet another program to fix the problems the other programs caused in the first place. The “poop patrol” is expected to cost about $750,000 and employs six people with two trucks. No word if the trucks are hybrid. “What we are trying to do is be proactive,” said Director of Public Works Mohammed Nuru. ”So we’ll have a crew that will roam around looking for locations. We actually have data for neighborhoods where we get frequent calls.” Nuru added that “what happens is we’re going to take one of those crews out and try to get ahead of those calls and look for these locations so that hopefully we can get less numbers of calls coming in.” Two things are disturbing about the city’s latest move. Judging from Nuru’s comments, it appears the city is more worried about having to answer phone calls, which is their job, than the actual danger posed by the feces. The second problem is the health danger the fecal matter poses. Pictures of workers cleaning up the problem seem to have one thing in common; they are wearing protective gear. This begs the question, where is the protective gear for the thousands of citizens walking on the streets every day? It may seem like a joke, and making fun of San Francisco is all the rage, but there is a real health threat to the people of the city. Ask anyone that was deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq. As a former contractor with the State Department in Kabul, Afghanistan, I can attest to the danger dried airborne fecal matter poses. The “Kabul Crud” hits just about every westerner that goes to the country usually within two weeks of arrival. The air in Kabul is not only filthy with dust, but it is also contaminated with dried fecal matter. This is what happens when you have an open sewer system, as San Francisco now appears to have. Dr. Lee Riley has warned about the dangers the conditions in San Francisco are posing to the residents warning about rotavirus stating, “If you happen to inhale that, it can also go into your intestine.” The virus can be fatal. San Francisco officials need to quit coming up with programs to fix its previously flawed programs. The city needs to get to the root of the problem, and that is its policies that encourage illegal drug use, which in turn attracts homelessness and its horrendous building regulations that cause homelessness.
The author of this article, Printus LeBlanc knows of what he speaks. I deployed to Afghanistan, myself, as a “field grade” Army Intelligence officer, and quickly got the infamous “Kabul Crud” which kept me down the first few days I was in “theater.” I’ve never been so sick in my life. San Francisco is the poster child of what happens when out-of-control, politically correct, extreme liberal policies area enacted by agenda-driven Democrats. Those liberal policies have failed. Period. I remember Pier 39, and enjoying great seafood there, etc. You couldn’t pay me to go there now. For disgusting pics and videos, feel free to click on the text above. Thanks to Printus for this eye-opening story, and exposing what’s going on in San Fran..
In a move that is alarming San Francisco’s biggest industry, a major medical association is pulling its annual convention out of the city — saying its members no longer feel safe. “It’s the first time that we have had an out-and-out cancellation over the issue, and this is a group that has been coming here every three or four years since the 1980s,” said Joe D’Alessandro, president and CEO of S.F. Travel, the city’s convention bureau. D’Alessandro declined to name the medical association, saying the bureau still hopes to bring the group back in the future. As a rule, major conventions book their visits at least five years in advance. So when D’Alessandro and members of the hospitality industry hadn’t heard from the doctors about re-upping, they flew to the organization’s Chicago headquarters for a face-to-face meeting with its executive board. And with good reason: The group’s annual five-day trade show draws 15,000 attendees and pumps about $40 million into the local economy. “They said that they are committed to this year and to 2023, but nothing in between or nothing thereafter,” D’Alessandro said. “After that, they told us they are planning to go elsewhere — I believe it’s Los Angeles.” The doctors group told the San Francisco delegation that while they loved the city, postconvention surveys showed their members were afraid to walk amid the open drug use, threatening behavior and mental illness that are common on the streets. It didn’t help that one board member had been assaulted near Moscone Center last year. “There was a time when the biggest obstacle to having a convention here was that it can be expensive, but now we have this new factor,” D’Alessandro said.
Indeed.. We’re seeing more and more stories like this out of San Francisco.. While disturbing and certainly unfortunate for it’s residents, it shouldn’t come as a surprise. San Fran is a city that has been under solid Democrat control for 50 years, with some of the most liberal policies and ordinances in the nation. They have spectacularly high taxes, an out-of-control homeless problem, and streets filled with drug paraphernalia and human feces. It’s common to see people urinate and defecate right in the open. And, car break-ins and thefts are on the rise, as are assaults. Going out to Pier 39 just isn’t worth it anymore. No wonder this professional group is taking their business elsewhere. As for the residents.. This is what they continue to vote for. So, they have nobody to blame but themselves.
A whopping 46 percent of California Bay Area residents fed up with the region’s high cost of living and soaring home prices are planning to pack their bags and move out in the next few years, a poll has found. The poll, conducted by the Bay Area Council, which describes itself as a business-sponsored, public policy advocacy organization, also found that homelessness and heavy traffic are among the things that most irk residents who live there. “This is the trend we’ve been observing. Two years ago, it was 34 percent and last year it was 40,” the group’s president, Jim Wunderman, told KTVU about the increasing amount of those polled indicating that they want to get out. The majority of the 1,000 polled said they have lived in the region for more than 20 years and increasingly believe that life in the Bay Area is heading in the wrong direction, despite mixed feelings about its economy. Forty-five percent of those who say they are planning to leave cited cost of living as the driving factor, while 27 percent said housing and rent costs are becoming too much to bear. Sixteen percent of that group said they plan to move somewhere else in California, while Texas, Oregon, Nevada and Arizona topped the most sought-after states outside of California for relocation. “On the downside of it is all the people who need to be here to provide all the services are being priced out,” Wunderman said to KTVU. “We’re seeing teachers, government workers, firefighters, police officers actually not able to live in the communities.” Ron and Elizabeth Haines, who have lived in the city of Pleasanton, say they are moving to Idaho this summer and are among the residents who believe living in the Bay Area is getting too expensive. “We are excited,” Elizabeth Haines told the station. “I have tons of friends and family here. It’s going to be hard, but I have a feeling we’re going to have lots of visitors.” Other residents who spoke to local media lamented home prices. “You kill yourself trying to pay for the housing and then you leave because it’s just ridiculous, right? So I mean, it sounds about right,” Ben Imadal of San Francisco told KGO-TV. Jack Hickox, also of San Francisco, said “almost all of my daughter’s friends and their parents have left. “We’re making it work for now. Cross my fingers, but it’s hard,” he told the station.
The Bay Area is a fun place to visit. I lived there in sunny Pleasanton (one of the cities mentioned) for a little over a year back around 2003-2004 while I was on active duty as an Army officer.. It was great! But, to echo the sentiments expressed here.. The cost of living there is beyond outrageous. That’s what happens when the entire state is under solid Democrat control with the out of control high taxes and confiscatory regulations and laws.. No wonder half the state wants to get the hell out! And, note how the article says a large portion of them want to go to Texas and Arizona; solidly red/conservative states. Imagine that..
San Francisco school officials have deemed chocolate milk too sugary for students, and they’re now phasing it out of district cafeterias. The San Francisco Unified School District’s board of education voted to add chocolate milk to a long list of banned food items in the city’s schools starting in elementary and middle schools this fall. School officials will impose the chocolate milk ban on high school students in the spring, the Associated Press reports. The change follows the district’s ongoing war on sugar that has already resulted in bans on candy, soda and other sugary drinks, and is designed to cut down on calories students consume at school. Nutrition experts told the San Francisco Chronicle that chocolate milk contains about 35 more calories and 10 grams of sugar more per carton than regular white milk, which translates to about 40 percent of students’ recommended daily sugar intake. “If that’s their one sort of sweet treat, then that’s fine,” Marlene Schwartz, director of the University of Connecticut Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, told the news site. “I think the reason flavored milk has gotten attacked is that it’s a waste of that sugar.” District officials opted to ban chocolate milk after testing the move at five schools last school year. At two of the schools, students consumed the same amount of milk as before, while students at three of the schools consumed less. “The kids grumbled about it for a couple of days,” but most simply switched to white milk, Student Nutrition Services director Libby Albert told the Chronicle. Those results seem to conflict with pilot studies in other California school districts. The Los Angeles Unified School District banned chocolate milk in 2011 citing the same argument against added sugar, but is now repealing the ban after a pilot study at 21 schools last year showed students drink more milk if it’s of the chocolate variety.
Yeah.. Imagine that! Kids drink more milk, if it’s chocolate. Wow.. And, these are the brain trusts entrusted with educating your children Be afraid! Just more fascist, liberal insanity on parade in the people’s republic of California. No wonder more parents want their kids in charter and private schools….or even home schooling them. To read the rest of this article, click on the text above. Unreal..
San Francisco’s public schools have been offered a classroom lesson plan that calls President-elect Donald Trump a racist, sexist man who became president “by pandering to a huge racist and sexist base.” The union that represents city teachers posted the plan on its website and distributed it via an email newsletter to its more than 6,000 members. The school district has more than 57,000 students. The Republican Party in San Francisco slammed the lesson plan. “It’s inappropriate on every level,” said Harmeet Dhillon, an RNC committeewoman from California. She called it “inappropriate propaganda that unfairly demonizes not only the campaign that Donald Trump, the winner, ran, but also all of the people who voted for him.” The plan was written by social studies teacher Fakhra Shah, who said she hadn’t planned for it to spread citywide — that was a step taken by the teacher’s union. She wrote it at 2 a.m. Nov. 9, just hours after results came in, to help teachers at her school struggling with how to answer students’ questions and concerns about Trump becoming president. City education officials have signaled support for the lesson plan, claiming it’s entirely optional for teachers to use — not part of the official curriculum. “Educators are entrusted to create lessons that reflect the California standards, support students’ social and emotional well-being and foster inclusive and safe school communities,” school district spokeswoman Gentle Blythe said in a statement that neither praised nor rebuked the lesson plan. San Francisco schools serve diverse populations and teachers are encouraged to include multiple perspectives in lessons, she added. “I think a lot of people were lost for words, wondering, ‘What do we say? What do we do?'” said Shah, whose Latino, African American, white, Muslim and LGBTQ students are worried about a surge in hate crimes since the election. “We’re calling him out,” she said. “If he’s our president, I have the right to hold him accountable and ask him to take a stance that is anti-hate and anti-racist.” The plan encourages teachers to let students express their concerns and to offer them hope and tell students that they can keep fighting. “We can uplift ourselves (and) fight oppression here at school even if we cannot control the rest of the country,” she said. San Francisco is diverse, with many students whose families are in the country illegally and who say they’re worried by Trump’s calls for deportation. Shah warned teachers that some students may use inappropriate words to express their fear and anger. “I know that they might curse and swear, but you would too if you have suffered under the constructs of white supremacy or experienced sexism, or any isms or lack of privilege,” she wrote. About 2,000 San Francisco students walked out of class last week to protest the new president. On Monday, Mayor Ed Lee declared that San Francisco would continue to provide sanctuary for all immigrants, religious minorities and gays and lesbians. The union that represents teachers, the United Educators of San Francisco, defended the plan. Union President Lita Blanc said that even House Speaker Paul Ryan had called Trump’s campaign racist and sexist. “There is a time and a place for using words that match action,” Blanc said. She praised the plan’s advice for students — “to stand up and defend themselves, and speak out for themselves and make a difference.”
There is so much wrong with all of that.. Where to being? First of all, nowhere in Donald Trump’s campaign, or since the election, has he said ANYTHING about the LGBT community. Nothing! The ONLY thing he has done since the election is allow for consideration for a position in the upcoming Trump administration the first openly gay ambassador! So, seems like he doesn’t have an issue with people who choose that lifestyle, or that candidate wouldn’t be in consideration. This hysteria is entirely unfounded. That’s the first thing that is SO wrong with this article. The second part is the extreme liberal teachers union in San Fran pushing this anti-Trump nonsense. Politics has NO place in secondary education. These “young skulls full of mush” need to be focusing on reading, writing, arithmetic, American history (i.e., what ACTUALLY happened; not a bunch of extreme liberal-agenda driven, politically correct, history revisionism), and so on; NOT being brainwashed into hating the next President.
In the wake of last week’s fatal Blue Angels jet crash in Tennessee, a San Francisco lawmaker wants to ban the famed F/A-18 fighter jets from being able to fly over his city — and, in his words, “strafe neighborhoods.” City Supervisor John Avalos, who long has waged a public battle decrying the squadron’s aerial acrobatics over San Francisco — at one point calling them loud “killing machines” — has introduced a nonbinding resolution to require the jets to only fly over the bay. He says the ban on flights over populated areas is needed to protect residents, and give them peace of mind. “It’s about them crashing and hitting a building — a place where people live,” Avalos told the San Francisco Chronicle. “It’s about the terror that they cause in people when they strafe neighborhoods. That’s something I hear about all the time when Blue Angels fly overhead.” While facing plenty of Twitter backlash for his comments, Avalos claimed a majority of residents oppose the flyovers that take place during the annual Fleet Week in October. Despite his complaints, Avalos told the Chronicle he expects the resolution, which he introduced on Tuesday, will not pass. Avalos’ office did not respond to calls for comment. A Navy spokesman also did not return a request for comment on the proposal. It is not the first time Avalos was part of a move to ban the Blue Angels. As a staffer for then-Supervisor Chris Daly in 2007, Avalos reportedly helped write a similar resolution that never moved beyond the committee level. Last year, Avalos used Fleet Week as an opportunity to launch an all-out Twitter assault on the military. Even in a city of colorful politicians, Avalos is good at grabbing headlines. In 2012, he was conflicted over whether to name a ship after Harvey Milk, one of the nation’s first openly gay politicians, who was gunned down by a colleague in 1978. Avalos wondered how Milk might have felt about the idea, so he used a Ouija board to solicit his opinion. The Board ended up backing the resolution to name a ship after Milk..
Wow.. You really can’t make this stuff up, folks.. This bed-wetting, Democrat loser in the city of brotherly lust (who cheats on his wife, and admitted as much) should be recalled for his brazenly offensive hatred of those who protect his right to be that offensive. At the very least, let’s hope that his silly resolution goes nowhere.. And then the Blue Angels should buzz his home in the middle of the night. That’d be karma. As for strafing.. That’s when they fire their machine gun cannons..which, of course, the Blue Angles never do as they don’t carry weaponry. So, not only is Avalos offensive…but he is totally clueless about what he’s talking, or Tweeting, about. To see some of his Tweets, click on the text above. What a tool..