Government Shutdown

Opinion/Analysis: Blue State Blues: Shutdowns Are Different When Republicans Fight Back

Spare, if you will, a moment’s pity for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). They are not exactly enjoying the government shutdown as they might have hoped. Pelosi had already packed her bags and boarded the Air Force bus Thursday, along with a sizable delegation of House Democratic leaders, for her overseas junket. She and her comrades were, no doubt, looking forward to touring NATO’s billion-dollar-plus new headquarters in Brussels; posing for selfies on camelback by the pyramids in Egypt; grinning for photo-ops with the troops in Afghanistan. Then the order came from President Donald Trump to prohibit her use of government aircraft. Fly commercial, he suggested. There is a government shutdown going on, after all. And, as Trump noted, 800,000 federal workers will continue to go unpaid — unless Democrats stay in town to negotiate. The bus went ’round the block and back. Pelosi’s shock must have been quite something to observe. She is not used to being treated like this, you see. She apparently expected she could cancel (ahem, “postpone”) the State of the Union address due to the shutdown — and then disappear abroad. Trump’s response — blocking Pelosi’s use of the aircraft — was gutsy. It was a “drain the swamp” moment. But the timing was pure comedy gold. (Adam Schiff, stepping off the bus, looked like he’d seen a Russian.) In a statement, Pelosi’s spokesman protested that the purpose of the trip had been “to affirm the United States’ ironclad commitment to the NATO alliance,” something the president had already done earlier that day. Her real goal was to conduct an alternative foreign policy — as she did after being elected Speaker in 2007, when she paid a friendly visit to Syrian butcher Bashar al-Assad. Pelosi’s flack complained that President Trump himself had flown to visit the troops in Iraq early in the shutdown. But Trump is the commander-in-chief, and Pelosi is not. How jarring for her to be reminded that although she might pretend the Constitution grants her equal power to the president, only Trump can turn the bus around.

Exactly!!  For more, click on the text above.  Thanks to Joel B. Pollak fot that outstanding analysis.     🙂

Opinion/Analysis: The absurdity of government ‘shutdowns’

Here we go again. One more time around on the crazy merry-go-round otherwise known as a broken and dysfunctional Washington, D.C. And as usual, in this game of absurd brinkmanship there are accusations, frustrations, misinformation and political games afoot. First of all, government shutdowns aren’t the end of the world. President Ronald Reagan had eight government shutdowns in his terms in office and the nation experienced strong economic growth. Quite frankly, if Republicans really knew how to win a messaging fight, they should shut the government down. When shutdowns take place, all non-essential federal employees are sent home. While there is a pause in their pay, historically Congress has voted to make that pay retroactive once government reopens. President Reagan said the nine most frightening words are: “We’re from the government and we’re here to help.” I’d like to see a new term to describe the government employees during a shutdown: “Now we know what you don’t do.” If Republicans were prepared and knew what there were doing – and they don’t currently – it would be a very interesting experiment for the American people to watch: how many of the nearly 2 million federal government employees who cost the taxpayers over $136 billion annually are actually essential? How many of the over 430 departments, agencies and sub-agencies are actually essential? Over the course of four or five weeks, when in fact the American peoples’ lives would not change, we would have a very clear picture of what is essential and what is not. But as Republicans typically end up on the short end of the stick in these political messaging fights, it’s clear they have no desire to shut government down. According to friends inside the Freedom Caucus, even many of them really don’t have a desire to shut government down. It appears the play is going to be for the House to pass a continuing resolution (CR) to fund government for the next four weeks, send it to the Senate and have every Republican senator vote for the CR. Since it will take 60 votes to pass that CR in the Senate – and since Sen. John McCain is absent for health reasons – 10 Democratic votes are needed to keep government going. Currently Democrats are trying to hold hostage America’s security and safety while blackmailing Republicans on behalf of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants and over a vulgar word that President Trump might, or might not, have said. All of this centers around the fight over DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) and how to successfully thread the needle on a political compromise. The parameters for a deal have already been laid out. Republicans would get full funding for the wall on our southern border and border security, an end to chain migration as we know it, and an end to the diversity visa lottery system. To please Democrats, Republicans are willing to have the roughly 700,000 immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children and now protected by DACA get legal status to avoid deportation. Many in President Trump’s base are perfectly fine with giving DACA recipients green cards and potentially a path to citizenship over several years. However, in an era of distrust, the path to citizenship for the DACA recipients should correlate with the completion of the southern border wall. If it takes five years to complete the wall, the path to citizenship should be five years, for example. What is also on display with the Democrats’ crass political games is their rank hypocrisy: in 2006, then-Senators Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer all voted for the Yuma Sector Wall on our border. And in 2010, Sen. Dick Durbin was on the floor of the Senate calling for an end to chain migration. In the short term, Republicans need to hold their ground, vote a CR through the House, have every Republican senator vote for it and then dare Democrats to shut government down. Democrats always loudly proclaim how essential all government is for the American people. Let’s see when push comes to shove if they’ll put the interests of hundreds of thousands of illegals over the priorities of the American people, who they will get to face this fall at the ballot box.

Agreed!!  And well said, Ned.  Ned Ryun is the founder and CEO of American Majority, a national grassroots organization.  As we all know the House has already passed a bill.  So, a little water under the bridge.   But, Ned’s points here are very well taken.  How much of “essential” agencies and government employees are truly essential?  And, if they’re so “essential,” then why is Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Dems holding the process hostage, and shutting the government down, all over some illegal aliens, and putting those illegals ahead of our “essential” government employees and so many “essential” federal government agencies.  And, why isn’t the dominantly liberal mainstream media asking Dems these questions?  Things that make ya go, “hmmmm”…