Michigan elections officials certified Monday that Donald Trump did win the state on Nov. 8, giving him a projected 306-232 win in the Electoral College — but his opponents are still trying to wrench the victory away from him, raising millions of dollars to force recounts in enough states to swipe the race. Wisconsin began its recount Monday, prodded by Green Party candidate Jill Stein, though the state’s election commission insisted they got it right and Mr. Trump will remain the winner. Ms. Stein also said she’ll demand a recount in Michigan, and filed a lawsuit begging a judge to order an audit in Pennsylvania. “After a presidential election tarnished by the use of outdated and unreliable machines and accusations of irregularities and hacks, people of all political persuasions are asking if our election results are reliable,” Ms. Stein said in a statement. “We must recount the votes so we can build trust in our election system.” She hasn’t pointed to specific evidence of fraud in the three states, instead basing her demands on pre-election fears of hacking and a disparity between opinion polls and the final results. Trump supporters were peeved, saying the recounts are an unseemly attempt to damage Mr. Trump as he prepares to claim the White House. If Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan results were all overturned, Mrs. Clinton would win the White House — though officials in each state doubted that was going to happen. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said Mr. Trump’s 22,000-vote victory in his state — about 1 percent of the votes cast — was enough to withstand any recount. “WI’s electoral process is fair & protected,” the governor said in a Twitter post. “Are #Recount2016 supporters really that surprised how rural Wisconsin voted?” And Mark Thomsen, chairman of Wisconsin’s elections commission and a Democrat, batted away accusations of fraud or hacking, and said the recount there will confirm Mr. Trump won. “I don’t expect that the outcome will be quantitatively different,” he said as he and his fellow board members announced recount procedures. They said localities can decide how to conduct their recounts — a victory for Mr. Trump, since it means a full hand recount isn’t required. In Michigan the results had been contested since election night, when Mr. Trump held a slim lead. The state’s canvassing board on Monday said he did, in fact, win by 10,704 votes out of 4.8 million cast in the presidential race. Now Ms. Stein and other Trump opponents have two days to file for a recount. In Pennsylvania Ms. Stein filed a lawsuit Monday on behalf of voters who disbelieve Mr. Trump won their state. The lawsuit’s evidence is circumstantial: Some computer scientists fear that hacking is possible, combined with the disparity between pre-election polling and the actual Election Day results. Their lawsuit demands a full recount, saying that’s the first step to figuring out if hacking occurred. Ms. Stein was also looking into whether she could demand recounts at the county level. “The nature of hacking is that you don’t see it if you don’t look,” she said on MSNBC. Pennsylvania Republicans mocked her lawsuit, calling it “a sad commentary on the failure of some to accept the results of the will of the people.”
Agreed! This, of course, will go nowhere.. But, it’s making for interesting tv for some, I suppose..