Month: January 2016

Clinton Campaign Likens Hillary to George Washington

Hillary Clinton might be the next George Washington. At least, that’s what Clinton’s campaign wants it supporters to believe. Clinton’s campaign is asserting that she’s “the most qualified candidate maybe since General George Washington himself!!” As surrogate James Carville write in an email to supporters on behalf of the campaign, “I read the other day that more of Bernie’s supporters have donated to support his campaign than Hillary’s. “I don’t mean to be cranky, but what in the hell is that all about?! We’ve got the best chance we’ve ever had to put a woman in the White House, and oh, by the way, she just happens to be the most qualified candidate maybe since General George Washington himself!! “Chip in $1 and let’s catch up to Bernie’s donors right now.This is crunch time now, daniel: This election is tighter than an alligator wearing a tutu. “Elections in Iowa and New Hampshire come down to getting a few extra voters here and there to come out for you, and you’ve gotta have that extra little edge to do that.”

Wow..  Just think..  A seasoned Democrat political hack like James Carville actually saying that Hillary Clinton is “the most qualified candidate maybe since General George Washington.”  You really can’t make this stuff up, folks.  How crazy is that?!?!  How delusional are these people?!?

Ebony Editor: GOP Candidates Have No Problem Putting All ‘Brown People Out’

Saturday on MSNBC’s “Melissa Harris-Perry,” Senior Editor Jamilah Lemieux reacted to the fear illegal immigrants have in Flint, MI to ask for help during the water crisis because of possibly being deported. According to Lemieux, Republicans have said they do not want to allow Muslims in the country, therefore they have no problem deporting anybody with brown skin. “You know what is one of the most terrifying moments for me is the possibility that a Republican could become the next president and that this precedent has been set by a Democrat — that we can come into your house at 4:00 or 5:00 in the morning while you’re asleep, take you and your family away; so if a Democrat is doing that, what happens next when we have candidates that have said, ‘I’m not letting Muslims in, and I have no problem putting all of you brown people out.’”

Another example of agenda-driven, self-righteous, black, racist liberals making everything about race…even when race has nothing to do with it.  When someone comes here illegally, they should be deported…regardless of gender, age, and yes..even ethnicity.  As it relates to the Muslim question that this editor from “Ebony” magazine (an inherently racist magazine, by definition), it has NOTHING to do with the color of their skin, you moron…but rather the dangerous ideology they espouse which has been an issue of relevance to our national security.  Someone needs to ask these two if they’re of what has been happening in Germany and other countries in Europe lately..  So, either these to brain trusts really are that stupid, OR they really do not understand the threat to our country posed by these so-called “refugees” from Islamic countries in the middle east and northern Africa…and that there is a VERY real, and present threat from Muslim terrorists trying to get into America.  Either way, they’re both fools..

Pentagon Conducts Warship Passage Near Disputed Island – China claims U.S. destroyer ‘driven off’

A U.S. Navy destroyer carried out a second transit near a disputed South China Sea island claimed by China and two other nations, the Pentagon announced Saturday. China’s Defense Ministry denounced the warship transit and said its forces had forced the destroyer USS Curtis Wilbur out of the area. Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. Bill Urban said the freedom of navigation operation by the Wilbur took place Saturday near Triton Island in the Paracel Islands chain in the northern part of the sea “to challenge excessive maritime claims.” “This operation challenged attempts by the three claimants, China, Taiwan and Vietnam, to restrict navigation rights and freedoms around the features they claim by policies that require prior permission or notification of transit within territorial seas,” Urban said in a statement. The Wilbur, a guided missile destroyer, passed within 12 nautical miles of Triton Island. “This operation was about challenging excessive maritime claims that restrict the rights and freedoms of the United States and others, not about territorial claims to land features,” he added. While the U.S. government takes no position on the competing sovereignty claims, “the United States does take a strong position on protecting the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea and airspace guaranteed to all countries, and that all maritime claims must comply with international law,” the spokesman said. None of the three nations’ governments were notified of the transit, the second time a U.S. warship has conducted a freedom of navigation operation after a hiatus in such operations of over three years. No details of the activities of the warship were disclosed. Freedom of navigation operations usually involve transit within 12 miles of an island along with operations that can include radar activity, flights of aircraft and maneuvers within the 12-mile limit. The operation also could have involved what is known as “innocent passage” through territorial waters. Retired Navy Capt. Jim Fanell, former Pacific Fleet intelligence chief, said Saturday’s operation was “a strategically important event that unambiguously demonstrates the continued resolve of the United States to challenge the unilateral actions of China’s maritime sovereignty campaign in the South China Sea.” “Beijing, not content with laying claim to their ‘New Spratly Islands,’ will be even further challenged to claim sovereignty over the disputed Paracel Islands,” Fanell said. “The long-term impact of this [freedom of navigation operation] will be measured by follow-on challenges to the PRC’s claims from all nations in the region.” Triton Island is near where China conducted oil drilling with a floating, deep-water rig in disputed waters close to Vietnam in July 2014. The Parcels, called the Xisha by China, were the location of a military confrontation between China and South Vietnam in 1974. During the battle, eight warships from both countries and some army forces clashed, resulting in Chinese control over several of the islands. The Paracels are a series of islands stretching around 100 miles from Tree Island in the northeast to Triton in the southwest. The Pentagon statement included Taiwan as one of the nations included the navigational challenge. Last week, Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou visited Taiping Island in the Spratly’s island chain in what Taiwanese officials said was an effort to gain access to international arbitration on the islands dispute. The Philippines government has challenged China’s claims to the Spratlys in an arbitration being held at the World Court in The Hague. Taiwan, which has several facilities and coast guard forces on Taiping Island, where Ma visited, has been blocked from taking part in the arbitration. Following the transit of the USS Lassens, a guided missile destroyer, in October, China’s government reacted harshly and called the transit a military provocation. China is claiming some 90 percent of the South China Sea as its maritime domain, and the Pentagon has said it rejects the claim. China has set up a vaguely defined “Nine Dash Line” covering most of the sea. Navy officials have said the Chinese claims have threatened the transit of some $5 trillion in annual trade through the region, including an estimated in $1.2 trillion in trade bound for the United States. President Barack Obama called on China in November to halt construction on some of the 3,000 acres of newly-created islands in the disputed waters that are now being militarized with airfields, deep water ports, and other military features. Days later, China’s government responded to the president’s call by announcing that the construction of military facilities would continue. China is building airstrips on three islands in the Spratlys that the Pentagon has said could be used to station warplanes capable of controlling the entire airspace over the sea. In the Parcels, China’s main military facility is located on Woody Island, about 90 miles northeast of Triton Island, where a military airstrip and other facilities were recently expanded. Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.), who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee and has been critical of the administration’s failure to conduct such freedom of navigation operations, praised the latest warship transit and said he was encouraged by the action.

As are we here at The Daily Buzz..  But, it is nowhere near enough.  China is behaving much like Russia; brazen in its global aggression.  And, it’s only acting that way, because it views American leadership as weak.  Anyway, to read the rest of this excellent piece by Bill Gertz, click on the text above.

‘Exoatmospheric kill vehicle’ designed to crash into nuclear missiles heading for the US tested over California

A missile defense rocket designed to smash incoming missiles out of the sky has been successfully launched from a military base in Central California. Authorities say a long-range interceptor blasted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base. The launch was testing thrusters on the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle, which is designed to crash into enemy missiles and destroy them. Officials said a target representing a missile was launched from an Air Force plane over the Pacific Ocean west of Hawaii. The Vandenberg interceptor released the kill vehicle, which was maneuvered with thrusters until its fuel was used up. It purposely didn’t intercept the target. The test involved the ground-based midcourse defense system. The missile shield system is supposed to protect America from attacks, but it has failed to hit targets in many tests. Later this year, an interceptor will try to destroy an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) target armed with countermeasures for the first time. A year later, MDA will launch two interceptors against a single ICBM. In 2018, MDA will conduct the first flight, a non-intercept test, of a redesigned version of the interceptor’s exo-atmospheric kill vehicle. Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon are working on different parts of the redesign. MDA wants to improve the reliability of the kill vehicle, which destroys an incoming warhead by colliding with it. And in a 2019 test, an interceptor with the redesigned kill vehicle will be programmed to use only two of its three stages, a potential option that could give warfighters more flexibility.

Very cool!  To read the rest of this article, click on the text above.   🙂

Texas Supreme Court rules cheerleaders can display Bible verses on banners

The Texas Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of high school cheerleaders who claimed that their free speech was being violated by their school district when it told them they couldn’t display banners with Bible verses at football games. The justices determined their ruling was still necessary even though the Kountze school district later allowed the banners. The court said the decision will protect the future display of religious-themed signs because the district has argued it retains the right to restrict them. The banners featured some Biblical verses such as, “I can do all things through Christ, who strengthens me.” The ruling now goes to the appeals court that ruled in 2014 the cheerleaders’ lawsuit was moot because the district changed its policy. Hiram Sasser, deputy chief counsel for the Texas-based Liberty Institute, a law firm that specializes in issues of religious liberty and represented the cheerleaders, said the question now becomes whether the school district will continue the fight. “Are they going to continue to bleed taxpayer money to fight for the right to censor religious speech?” Sasser asked. Thomas Brandt, the attorney representing the district, had initially said the issue doesn’t concern free speech because it has editorial control over the content of the banners. He said that the district would not forbid any banners that were religious in nature, but would do so if they contained language that was offensive or in poor taste. Another issue, says Beaumont attorney David Starnes, who also represented the cheerleaders, is whose speech is being represented. The banners represent the private speech of the students who made them, he said, but the district has asserted it retained the right to restrict content because it viewed the banners as government speech. The Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation filed a complaint in 2012 that sought to have the banners banned. Various state officials, including Gov. Greg Abbott, have supported the cheerleaders and filed court papers seeking to intervene on their behalf. Attorney General Ken Paxton released a statement Friday applauding the court ruling. “Religious liberty, deemed by our nation’s founders as the ‘First Freedom,’ is the foundation upon which our society has been built,” he said.

Exactly right, Mr. Attorney General!!  And, glad to see the Texas Supreme Court concurs.  This is a BIG victory not only for religious freedom, but also for free speech.  These anti-Christian pc police and speech nazis just smacked down.  Outstanding ruling!!   🙂

Sessions: Choose carefully America, 2016 is ‘THE LAST CHANCE’

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, a leading voice on trade, immigration and executive powers, is urging Americans to choose their next president carefully because 2016 “is the last chance for the American people to take back control of their government.” In a sober interview with Secrets, the Republican warned that liberal special interests, Wall Street moguls, and international media conglomerates are fast turning the United States into just another member of the European Union and that the effort is being led by a Democratic president eager to go his own way with executive orders. “This election is different because we have pall-mall erosion of law, the constitutional order, where President Obama has pushed an agenda that eviscerates the immigration legal system, and pushed this trade agreement that will commence decades of transferring American economic power to an ever-expanding international commission. It’s just not going to stop” unless voters take action, he warned. “This is the way the European Union began,” he added. Highlighting immigration and trade, Sessions urged voters to choose a candidate who will commit to killing the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal with nearly a dozen Asian nations which is slated to cost 448,000 U.S. jobs, and finally make good on 30 years of promises to put an end to illegal immigration, which is costing the nation billions in welfare and undermining U.S. wages. “This election will be the last chance for Americans to get control of their government,” said Sessions, repeatedly making that point. “I think this election is the big one. To win, Republicans need to demonstrate that they care about the average person who goes to work every day,” he added. Most Republicans are against TPP, and even Hillary Clinton has come out in opposition of a deal she laid the groundwork for and once called the gold standard. And there is some difference on immigration between the Republican candidates. Sessions said that if candidates don’t promise to end TPP and close the border, voters should move on. “People should have total confidence and a clear commitment on those issues. If they don’t, then they don’t have my vote,” he said. The influence of Sessions on key issues in the presidential race, especially TPP and immigration, can’t be underestimated. He was the loudest voice against TPP, which the president plans to sign in the coming weeks, and helped Donald Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz on immigration issues. He warned that if the next president OK’s TPP, it would erode U.S. economic power and put trade under a powerful commission on which America would have just one vote. On immigration, he slammed decades of failed promises. “It’s been a sham, decade after decade, and the voters need to know that this might be the last chance to elect a president who can reduce this tide and to end the illegality and serve the interests of working Americans. Their jobs, their wages, their hospitals, their schools the public safety, have to be put first,” Sessions urged. “We need a president with the credibility to tell the world that the time of illegality is over not come to this country unlawfully,” he said.


Obama proposing rule to force companies to disclose salaries based on gender

The Obama administration is proposing new regulations that would require large employers to disclose how much they pay men and women, the latest move in President Obama’s efforts to equalize wages. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Friday published a plan to begin gathering pay data from employers with 100 or more workers, looking at information on gender, race and ethnicity. The government will use the information to target companies that may be discriminating against women for enforcement action. At the White House Friday, Mr. Obama said the move would “help businesses that are trying to do the right thing.” He said it’s unfair that a woman earn 79 cents on average for every dollar earned by a man, and he highlighted racial inequities in wages. “The gap’s even wider for women of color,” Mr. Obama said. “A typical black working woman makes only 60 cents, a typical Latino woman makes only 55 cents for every dollar a white man earns. And that’s not right. We’re talking about, often times, folks doing the same job and paid differently.” The White House said its proposal, which won’t require legislative approval, will cover more than 63 million workers. There will be a 60-day comment period before companies would have to begin submitting the data in September 2017. National studies have shown that women are paid, on average, 79 cents for each dollar earned by men. Economists say it’s difficult to compare wages in different industries and backgrounds, and critics have noted that the Obama White House also hasn’t paid female employees as much as males, on average. The move expands a Labor Department plan for federal contractors and subcontractors to collect such information, after an order issued by Mr. Obama in April 2014. Mr. Obama is marking the seventh anniversary Friday of signing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, named for the woman who took her case of pay discrimination to the Supreme Court. The law gives plaintiffs a more generous time frame in which to file complaints over wage bias.

More big government, fascist, job-killing crap from our nazi-in-chief..  Unreal..

Opinion/Analysis: For Hillary Clinton, Feminism Means ‘Blame Men First,’ and to Disagree Is ‘Misogyny’

Please allow me to explain the progressive rules of modern discourse. A feminist — often seated in a powerful perch in academe, the government, or pop culture — spits out disdain for men as a whole, reserving particular venom for the worst of people, the dreaded “white male.” Never mind that white males include everyone from Bill Gates to a recovering junkie living in a trailer park, this courageous action is called “punching up.” It’s “speaking truth to power.” If the white male responds — especially if that response either is angry or includes any sort of sweeping generalization about women — then that man is “punching down.” He’s spewing hate and perpetuating the patriarchy. Thus, a white male student can oppress his professor merely be responding to her arguments, and Hillary Clinton is victimized by sexism merely because Bernie Sanders accused her of “shouting.” When inhabiting the comfortable confines of progressive cocoons, this style of argument is a no-lose proposition. The angry leftists’ position on the moral high ground is so unassailable that the very act of resistance is seen as proof of their argument. “Look at the angry white male. He can’t stand seeing a mere woman question his power and privilege.” Either the man acquiesces, or he’s a misogynist. But when the feminist leaves the cocoon, the argument is far less persuasive, and men are more difficult to browbeat. I was reminded of this reality by Camille Paglia’s fascinating recent essay in Salon, where she traces Clinton’s roots in “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” second-wave feminism. Paglia observes: “Hillary has unfortunately adopted the [Gloria] Steinem brand of blame-men-first feminism, which defines women as perpetual victims requiring government protections. Hillary’s sometimes impatient or patronizing tone about men, which can perhaps be traced to key aspects of her personal history, may prove costly to her current campaign.” Indeed, the gender gap hurt Clinton in 2008, Bernie Sanders is riding a massive gender gap to contention in Iowa, and early numbers indicate that Clinton could face the widest gender gap in modern political history in the general election. To her hard-core supporters, however, this is all proof of pervasive misogyny. The solution is more identity politics, more accusations of sexism, and more public shaming. But Clinton lost in 2008 when the race devolved into competing claims of racism and sexism, and the non-progressive public is growing increasingly inoculated against political correctness. Clinton forgets that there are very good reasons why the public embraces fairness and equal treatment for women while shunning “feminism.” Indeed, a recent Vox survey found that only 18 percent of Americans call themselves feminists. Increasingly, the public experiences feminism more as an anti-male ideology than a pro-female movement. It’s about tearing down more than building up, and that kind of messaging is deeply repugnant to the millions of women who actually like men — especially their husbands, fathers, and sons. Indeed, as modern feminists often view even the effort to be likeable as a capitulation to patriarchal norms, look for leftists to grow only more strident. And why not? It keeps working in universities, Hollywood, and government. Surely it will work in November. Despite the Democrats’ demographic triumphalism, Clinton looks to be a weaker general-election candidate than Barack Obama. As the race progresses, it will be interesting to see how her progressive allies deal with the gender gap. I’m expecting more hectoring, more public shaming, and claims of sexism at every turn. Expecting to rally women in a grand crusade, they may find out that gender solidarity isn’t as easy to manufacture as racial solidarity, and that the “coalition of the ascendant” is more fragile than they thought. — David French is an attorney and Army Reserve officer (Major) who was awarded the Bronze Star for his service in Iraq

Again, David nails it here.  Hillary’s shameless playing of the gender card is getting old, and falling flat with voters.  So far, Trump is the only GOP candidate who really understands it, and isn’t putting up with her nonsense.

ESPN’s Bomani Jones on Cam Newton Bashing: ‘Simple Reality’ the Country ‘Does Not Like Black People Very Much’

On Thursday’s broadcast of ESPN Radio’s “The Right Time,” host Bomani Jones responded to the criticism of Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton. Jones referred to Newton as a “blackety-black” quarterback that you can better picture in your mind than Seattle’s Russell Wilson or San Francisco’s Colin Kaepernick, which he said plays into why Newton receives criticism for his on-field celebrations. He also added that there is a “historical lineage that indicates a lot has been done to keep black people from playing quarterback,” despite the fact that five black quarterbacks are currently starting in the NFL and around 10 more are serving as backups. The ESPN personality later said it is OK to talk about the “simple reality” that the country “does not like black people very much.” Jones concluded that Newton’s past is the main reason people get angry when they discuss him, citing his being in possession of a stolen laptop, which Newton said he bought, while a sophomore at Florida to crime and his allegations of being paid to play at Auburn, despite never actually being found guilty by the NCAA of receiving money from Auburn. According to Jones, people in this country correlate the crime of theft and being investigated by the NCAA to race. “The views that people have in this country about crime correlate it to race; the views people have in this country about the NCAA and their regulations correlate it to race. It’s all there. You can’t avoid that fact. Just like you can’t avoid the fact that Cam is black,” he said.

Hey Bomani..  We don’t care.  Those of us who watch the NFL couldn’t give a rat’s ass what the ethnicity of the quarterbacks, or any of the other players, are.  We just care that if they’re on our team, that they play well and win!  Period.  As a life-long RAMS fan (both LA and STL), I have some autographed paraphernalia from former St. Louis RAMS QB Kurt Warner, who happens to be white.  I also have an autographed jersey from former RAMS WR Tory Holt, who is black.  Imagine that!!  People don’t care if a QB is black, Bomani.  They just care that he’s the best.  And, c’mon  Let’s be honest..  We HAVE seen situations in the NFL where the NFL, and liberal media outlets like ESPN, promote someone who isn’t the best by a LONG shot, but is black.  So, he gets the attention over some other white QB, because he IS black.  THAT is what some people get a little irritated, and tired of…and rightfully so.  The team should play the best player…regardless of his race; NOT because of it.  This obnoxious, self-righteous, entitlement-minded, (and yes) black racist tool should be fired by ESPN for shamelessly playing the race card like this.

Official: Some Clinton emails ‘too damaging’ to release

The intelligence community has deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging” to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding. The determination was first reported by Fox News, hours before the State Department formally announced Friday that seven email chains, found in 22 documents, will be withheld “in full” because they, in fact, contain “Top Secret” information. The State Department, when first contacted by Fox News about withholding such emails Friday morning, did not dispute the reporting – but did not comment in detail. After a version of this report was first published, the Obama administration confirmed to the Associated Press that the seven email chains would be withheld. The department has since confirmed those details publicly. The decision to withhold the documents in full, and not provide even a partial release with redactions, further undercuts claims by the State Department and the Clinton campaign that none of the intelligence in the emails was classified when it hit Clinton’s personal server. Fox News is told the emails include intelligence from “special access programs,” or SAP, which is considered beyond “Top Secret.” A Jan. 14 letter, first reported by Fox News, from intelligence community Inspector General Charles McCullough III notified senior intelligence and foreign relations committee leaders that “several dozen emails containing classified information” were determined to be “at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, AND TOP SECRET/SAP levels.” The State Department is trying to finish its review and public release of thousands of Clinton emails, as the Democratic presidential primary contests get underway in early February. Under the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, there is an exemption that allows for highly sensitive, and in this case classified, material to be withheld in full — which means nothing would be released in these cases, not even heavily redacted versions, which has been standard practice with the 1,340 such emails made public so far by the State Department. According to the Justice Department FOIA website, exemption “B3” allows a carve-out for both the CIA and NSA to withhold “operational files.” Similar provisions also apply to other agencies. Fox News reported Friday that at least one Clinton email contained information identified as “HCS-O,” which is the code for intelligence from human spying. One source, not authorized to speak on the record, suggested the intelligence agencies are operating on the assumption there are more copies of the Clinton emails out there, and even releasing a partial email would provide enough clues to trace back to the original – which could allow the identification of “special access programs” intelligence. There was no comment to Fox News from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Office of the Intelligence Community Inspector General, or the agency involved. Fox News has chosen not to identify the agency that provided sworn declarations that intelligence beyond Top Secret was found in the Clinton emails. The State Department was scheduled to release more Clinton emails Friday, while asking a D.C. federal court for an extension. FBI investigators looking into the emails are focused on the criminal code pertaining to “gross negligence” in the handling and storage of classified information, and “public corruption.” “The documents alone in and of themselves set forth a set of compelling, articulable facts that statutes relating to espionage have been violated,” a former senior federal law enforcement officer said. The source said the ongoing investigation along the corruption track “also stems from her tenure of secretary. These charges would be inseparable from the other charges in as much as there is potential for significant overlap and correlation.” Based on federal regulations, once classified information is spilled onto a personal computer or device, as was the case with Clinton and her aides, the hardware is now considered classified at the highest classification level of the materials received. While criticized by the Clinton campaign, McCullough, an Obama administration appointee, was relaying the conclusion of two intelligence agencies in his letter to Congress that the information was classified when it hit Clinton’s server — and not his own judgment. Joseph E. Schmitz, a former inspector general of the Department of Defense, called the attacks on McCullough a “shoot the watchdog” tactic by Clinton’s campaign. The developments, taken together, show Clinton finding herself once again at the epicenter of a controversy over incomplete records. During her time as the first female partner at the Rose Law firm in Arkansas during the mid-1980s, she was known as one of the “three amigos” and close with partners Webb Hubbell and Vince Foster. Hubbell ended up a convicted felon for his role in the failure of the corrupt Madison Guaranty, a savings and loan which cost taxpayers more than $65 million. Hubbell embezzled more than a half-million dollars from the firm. Foster killed himself in Washington, D.C., in July 1993. As Clinton’s partner in the Rose Law firm, he had followed the Clintons into the White House where he served as the Clintons’ personal lawyer and a White House deputy counsel. Clinton’s missing Rose Law billing records for her work for Guaranty during the mid-1980s were the subject of three intense federal investigations over two years. Those records, in the form of a computerized printout of her work performed on behalf of Guaranty, were discovered under mysterious circumstances in the Book Room of the private White House living quarters. The discovery of those records was announced during a blizzard in January 1996 by attorney David Kendall, who still represents Hillary Clinton. After Clinton testified before a grand jury, prosecutors concluded there was insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt she committed perjury or obstruction of justice. Despite Clinton’s recent public statements about not knowing how the technology works, at least one email suggests she directed a subordinate to work around the rules. In a June 2011 email to aide Jake Sullivan, she instructed him to take what appeared to be classified talking points, and “turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” A State Department spokesman could not say whether such a fax was sent. -Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent

Some really outstanding journalism from Catherine Herridge.  She’s being a pitbull on this topic.  So, kudos to her for her efforts here.  As we’ve been saying for over a year here at The Daily Buzz..  This will only continue to get worse for Hillary.  It is hard to even imagine how she will not get indicted at this point.  Her, and her hubby’s, corruption knows no limits.  Catherine took us down a little memory lane about Hillary’s time at the Rose Law Firm and some of her associates who ended up in prison, and dead…as well as those records that suddenly, mysteriously, showed up in the living quarters of the White House.  When people think of the Clintons, they think about Bill and Monica.  That was nothing compared to the many other things that went on in the Clinton White House.  I really think this latest email scandal will be the tipping point for many potential voters who are just sick and tired of Clinton corruption…and have had enough.  The other day, comedian Tim Allen said, “The Clintons are like herpes:  Just when you think they’re gone, they show up again.”   We agree…  But, God-forbid she becomes the Dem nominee, we as a nation should vote for whoever the GOP nominates (whoever he or she is) and be done with the Clintons and their nonsense once and for all.